ABSTRACT
Accurate and representative data is vital for precisely reporting the impact of influenza in healthcare systems. Northern hemisphere winter 2022/23 experienced the most substantial influenza wave since the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020. Simultaneously, new data streams become available within health services because of the pandemic. Comparing these data, surveillance and administrative, supports the accurate monitoring of population level disease trends. We analysed admissions rates per capita from four different collection mechanisms covering National Health Service hospital Trusts in England over the winter 2022/23 wave. We adjust for difference in reporting and extracted key epidemic characteristics including the maximum admission rate, peak timing, cumulative season admissions and growth rates by fitting generalised additive models at national and regional levels. By modelling the admission rates per capita across surveillance and administrative data systems we show that different data measuring the epidemic produce different estimates of key quantities. Nationally and in most regions the data correspond well for the maximum admission rate, date of peak and growth rate, however, in subnational analysis discrepancies in estimates arose, particularly for the cumulative admission rate. This research shows that the choice of data used to measure seasonal influenza epidemics can influence analysis substantially at sub-national levels. For the admission rate per capita there is comparability in the sentinel surveillance approach (which has other important functions), rapid situational reports, operational databases and time lagged administrative data giving assurance in their combined value. Utilising multiple sources of data aids understanding of the impact of seasonal influenza epidemics in the population.